whoever you want to be…

Artemisia Will Cut You. Figuratively.

Artemisia Gentileschi.  You may have heard of her.

Artemisia was a painter’s daughter who grew to be a painter in her own right.  When she was 20, she completed this:

Judith beheading Holofernes (1612–1613)

This is not a girl you want to mess with.  When I read that this painting was her “response” to her rapist (her rapist’s features are that of Holofernes and Artemisia herself is holding the short sword), I couldn’t help but feel impressed with her method of catharsis.  The man who raped her is, to this day, still known as a rapist rather than the modest and obscure painter he could have been.

Ignominy for all time hundreds of years before the internet.  Hats off.

Given the following, it wouldn’t be surprising if a large part of her oeuvre following the rape was affected:

“The trial was a painful public humiliation for Artemisia. During the proceedings, she underwent vaginal examination and torture with thumbscrews. She was accused of being unchaste when she met Tassi and also of promiscuity. [Tassi] also attacked her professional reputation. A transcript of the seven-month court case survives.” Quote

The victim was tortured with thumbscrews, seven months of pure hell where her every move is scrutinized, her assailant got a slap on the wrist despite it being proven that he was guilty and Artemisia got thrown into a marriage because she was “ruined”.  As if that wasn’t enough, her marriage was with a gambler who squandered everything she earned and was continually in debt.  Debts that she had to cover because her husband was averse to actually working.

Despite all this, Artemisia triumphed.  Her work continued to gain respect.  On repeated occasions, she painted women who chose not to be pawns of powerful males.

Jael and Sisera (1620)

Unfortunately, some of these women were in the process of doing themselves in.

Lucretia (1621)

In 1624 her influence was such that Roman census takers noted that she was the head of the household rather than just being noted as her husband’s wife.  She was a well-known and respected “woman” painter and her clients (patrons) were cardinals and dukes.  In the 1630s she painted for royalty (Philip IV of Spain, Charles I of England, and the Duke of Modena).

And yet for a long time, Artemisia’s legacy traipsed into obscurity.

Could this be because her later works lacked the aggressive panache of her earlier works or is it simply because of her gender?

At this point, it’s hard to say.  It would be easy to say that it was because of her gender, but I wonder.  Personally (and I’m saying this as a woman), I think that her art became soft and boring.  Her “success” as a “woman” painter was like that of her male contemporaries: subject to the asthetic demands of her clients (who, given their status in society, probably didn’t want to make waves).

Artemisia though should be congratulated because she was indifferent about her status as a “woman” painter in a profession dominated by men.  And the men of her generation didn’t seem to care a quaff about whether or not she was a woman: it was her talent that counted.

That’s true equality.

And that was hundreds of years ago.

How far we’ve come: or have we?

Advertisements

About jchevais

Canadian expat turned Parisian Burb Babe. It's so lovely.

10 comments on “Artemisia Will Cut You. Figuratively.

  1. suzieblue85
    September 4, 2012

    This is a really thought provoking post. I’m about to start writing a dissertation on how law has affected gender inequality issues, and through the research I’ve done so far I’ve realised how complicated these issues are. Very interesting!

    • jchevais
      September 4, 2012

      That sounds like a fascinating topic! And yes, it is all very complicated: I still can’t get my mind around the thumbscrews. Unbelievable.

      • suzieblue85
        September 4, 2012

        I know, that’s horrific. It sounds like a “she’s a woman therefore she must be lying” kind of mindset. Not unlike today’s courtroom tactic of trying to have a rape victim’s past sexual history introduced as evidence for the defense. Shudder!

  2. zouarvehat
    September 5, 2012

    I’m all for women killing their rapists. That sends a message far better than any “feminist” polemic. And it stops recidivism!

    • jchevais
      September 5, 2012

      It sure would!

  3. Stella
    September 5, 2012

    Very interesting post.

    • jchevais
      September 5, 2012

      Thanks, Stella.

      • Stella
        September 5, 2012

        I’m annoyed now that I didn’t know more about this painting before I visited the Uffizi recently or I would have sought it out for a proper look. Can you come on all my museum visits from now on?

  4. Pingback: Mum beheads rapist, faces trial | Bazaar Daily News

  5. Pingback: Artemisia Gentileschi, Italian woman artist | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Comments are closed.

Information

This entry was posted on September 4, 2012 by in Bea Creative.
Follow whoever you want to be… on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

%d bloggers like this: